Each doc verified against current code; stale claims fixed in place. - architecture: handshake/binary-frame/route/module-table corrections - data-model: atomic-write claim narrowed, missing daemon files/fields added - development: db:query removed (SQLite/Drizzle gone), tmux→concurrently+portless, PASEO_HOME split - unistyles: withUnistyles(Icon) is the dominant pattern; new Animated.View+dynamic-styles iOS gotcha - SECURITY: bearer-token auth, DNS-rebinding allowlist semantics, ephemeral phone keypair, wire format - glossary: Project-checkout rename has shipped - providers: claude-acp not built-in, Pi/mock, async isCommandAvailable, interface drift - coding-standards: rewritten as compressed /unslop adaptation - product/release/testing/custom-providers/android/mobile-testing/ad-hoc-daemon-testing/file-icons/design: smaller corrections
6.7 KiB
Testing
Philosophy
Tests prove behavior, not structure. Every test should answer: "what user-visible or API-visible behavior does this verify?"
Test-driven development
Work in vertical slices: one test, one implementation, repeat. Each test responds to what you learned from the previous cycle.
RIGHT (vertical):
RED→GREEN: test1→impl1
RED→GREEN: test2→impl2
RED→GREEN: test3→impl3
WRONG (horizontal):
RED: test1, test2, test3, test4, test5
GREEN: impl1, impl2, impl3, impl4, impl5
Writing all tests first then all implementation produces bad tests — you end up testing imagined behavior instead of actual behavior.
Determinism first
Tests must produce the same result every run:
- No conditional assertions or branching paths
- No reliance on timing, randomness, or network jitter
- No weak assertions (
toBeTruthy,toBeDefined) - Assert the full intended behavior, not fragments
// Bad: conditional and weak
it("creates a tool call", async () => {
const result = await createToolCall(input);
if (result.ok) {
expect(result.id).toBeDefined();
}
});
// Good: deterministic and explicit
it("returns timeout error when provider times out", async () => {
const result = await createToolCall(input);
expect(result).toEqual({
ok: false,
error: { code: "PROVIDER_TIMEOUT", waitedMs: 30000 },
});
});
Flaky tests are a bug
Never remove a test because it's flaky. Find the variance source (time, randomness, race condition, shared state, non-deterministic output, environment drift) and fix it.
Real dependencies over mocks
Mocks are not the default. They require an explicit decision.
- Database: real test database, not a mock
- APIs: real APIs with test/sandbox credentials, not request mocks
- File system: temporary directory that gets cleaned up, not fs mocks
Ask: "will this still hold with real dependencies at runtime?" If no, don't mock.
Use swappable adapters instead
When you need test isolation, design code so dependencies are injectable:
interface EmailSender {
send(to: string, body: string): Promise<void>;
}
// Production
const realSender: EmailSender = { send: sendgrid.send };
// Test: in-memory adapter
function createTestEmailSender() {
const sent: Array<{ to: string; body: string }> = [];
return {
send: async (to: string, body: string) => {
sent.push({ to, body });
},
sent,
};
}
End-to-end means end-to-end
When a test is labeled end-to-end, it calls the real service. No environment variable gates, no conditional skipping, no mocking the external dependency.
Test organization
- Collocate tests with implementation:
thing.ts+thing.test.ts - Extract complex setup into reusable helpers
- Test bodies should read like plain English
- Build a vocabulary of test helpers that make complex flows simple
File naming
Vitest picks up tests by suffix. The suffix tells the runner which category it belongs to.
| Suffix | What it is | Where it runs |
|---|---|---|
*.test.ts(x) |
Unit test — pure, fast, no daemon | npm run test:unit |
*.posix.test.ts |
Unit test that needs POSIX-only behavior | unit, skipped on Windows |
*.browser.test.ts |
App test that needs a real browser (DOM) | npm run test:browser (Vitest browser mode, Playwright provider, headless Chromium) |
*.e2e.test.ts |
End-to-end against a real daemon | npm run test:e2e |
*.real.e2e.test.ts |
E2E that hits a real provider (Claude/Codex/OpenCode) — needs creds in packages/server/.env.test |
npm run test:integration:real / test:e2e:real |
*.local.e2e.test.ts |
E2E that needs a local-only resource | npm run test:integration:local / test:e2e:local |
App-level Playwright browser E2E lives in packages/app/e2e/*.spec.ts and runs via npm run test:e2e --workspace=@getpaseo/app (separate from Vitest E2E).
Test setup
- Server:
packages/server/src/test-utils/vitest-setup.tsloads.env.test, setsPASEO_SUPERVISED=0, and disables Git/SSH prompts. Add new global env shims here, not in individual tests. - App:
packages/app/vitest.setup.tsprovidesexpo/__DEV__shims and stubs a few native-only modules (react-native-unistyles,react-native-svg,expo-linking,@xterm/addon-ligatures). Stubbing here is for modules that have no meaningful Node behavior — not a license to mock app code.
Running tests locally
Test suites in this repo are heavy. Running them in bulk freezes the machine, especially with multiple agents in parallel.
- Run only the file you changed:
npx vitest run <path> --bail=1 - Never run
npm run testfor a whole workspace unless asked. - For a broad sweep, redirect to a file and read it after:
npx vitest run <path> --bail=1 > /tmp/test-output.txt 2>&1 - Never re-run a suite another agent already reported green.
- For full-suite confidence, push to CI and check GitHub Actions.
- Never run Playwright E2E (
packages/app/e2e/*.spec.ts) locally — defer to CI.
Agent authentication in tests
Agent providers handle their own auth. Do not add auth checks, environment variable gates, or conditional skips to tests. If auth fails, report it.
Debugging with tests
Use the test as your debugging ground:
- Add temporary logging to the code under test
- Run the test, observe actual values
- Trace the flow end-to-end through test output
- Confirm each assumption with actual output
- Remove logging when done
The test output is the source of truth, not your reading of the code.
Design for testability
If code isn't testable, refactor it. Signs:
- You want to reach for a mock
- You can't inject a dependency
- You need to test private internals
- Setup requires too much global state
Aim for deep modules: small interface, deep implementation. Fewer methods = fewer tests needed, simpler params = simpler setup.