paseo/docs/testing.md

Testing

Philosophy

Tests prove behavior, not structure. Every test should answer: "what user-visible or API-visible behavior does this verify?"

Test-driven development

Work in vertical slices: one test, one implementation, repeat. Each test responds to what you learned from the previous cycle.

RIGHT (vertical):
  RED→GREEN: test1→impl1
  RED→GREEN: test2→impl2
  RED→GREEN: test3→impl3

WRONG (horizontal):
  RED:   test1, test2, test3, test4, test5
  GREEN: impl1, impl2, impl3, impl4, impl5

Writing all tests first then all implementation produces bad tests — you end up testing imagined behavior instead of actual behavior.

Determinism first

Tests must produce the same result every run:

• No conditional assertions or branching paths
• No reliance on timing, randomness, or network jitter
• No weak assertions (toBeTruthy, toBeDefined)
• Assert the full intended behavior, not fragments

// Bad: conditional and weak
it("creates a tool call", async () => {
  const result = await createToolCall(input);
  if (result.ok) {
    expect(result.id).toBeDefined();
  }
});

// Good: deterministic and explicit
it("returns timeout error when provider times out", async () => {
  const result = await createToolCall(input);
  expect(result).toEqual({
    ok: false,
    error: { code: "PROVIDER_TIMEOUT", waitedMs: 30000 },
  });
});

Flaky tests are a bug

Never remove a test because it's flaky. Find the variance source (time, randomness, race condition, shared state, non-deterministic output, environment drift) and fix it.

Real dependencies over mocks

Mocks are not the default. They require an explicit decision.

• Database: real test database, not a mock
• APIs: real APIs with test/sandbox credentials, not request mocks
• File system: temporary directory that gets cleaned up, not fs mocks

Ask: "will this still hold with real dependencies at runtime?" If no, don't mock.

Use swappable adapters instead

When you need test isolation, design code so dependencies are injectable:

interface EmailSender {
  send(to: string, body: string): Promise<void>;
}

// Production
const realSender: EmailSender = { send: sendgrid.send };

// Test: in-memory adapter
function createTestEmailSender() {
  const sent: Array<{ to: string; body: string }> = [];
  return {
    send: async (to: string, body: string) => {
      sent.push({ to, body });
    },
    sent,
  };
}

End-to-end means end-to-end

When a test is labeled end-to-end, it calls the real service. No environment variable gates, no conditional skipping, no mocking the external dependency.

Test organization

• Collocate tests with implementation: thing.ts + thing.test.ts
• Extract complex setup into reusable helpers
• Test bodies should read like plain English
• Build a vocabulary of test helpers that make complex flows simple

Agent authentication in tests

Agent providers handle their own auth. Do not add auth checks, environment variable gates, or conditional skips to tests. If auth fails, report it.

Debugging with tests

Use the test as your debugging ground:

1. Add temporary logging to the code under test
2. Run the test, observe actual values
3. Trace the flow end-to-end through test output
4. Confirm each assumption with actual output
5. Remove logging when done

The test output is the source of truth, not your reading of the code.

Design for testability

If code isn't testable, refactor it. Signs:

• You want to reach for a mock
• You can't inject a dependency
• You need to test private internals
• Setup requires too much global state

Aim for deep modules: small interface, deep implementation. Fewer methods = fewer tests needed, simpler params = simpler setup.