mirror of
https://github.com/getpaseo/paseo.git
synced 2026-07-29 12:01:31 +00:00
* chore: add issue forms, PR template, contributor guidance - bug report and feature request issue forms with structured fields for surface, version, provider, logs, screenshots - issue config disables blank issues and routes casual questions to Discord - single PR template with explicit verification section and AI-assisted contribution stance - CONTRIBUTING.md: soften drive-by stance for objective bug fixes, codify expectations on AI-assisted reports and PRs (full logs over summaries, proof of testing over prose) * chore: drop BDFL framing for one-person team * chore: tighten CONTRIBUTING, drop duplication
44 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
44 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
<!--
|
|
Please follow this template. The PR template applies whether you opened the PR via the web UI, `gh pr create`, or any other tool.
|
|
|
|
If you're fixing an objective bug or a small focused issue, this should be quick. Big PRs without a prior issue or design discussion are likely to be closed or scoped down. See CONTRIBUTING.md.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
### Linked issue
|
|
|
|
Closes #
|
|
|
|
<!-- Bug fixes and behavior changes should reference an issue. Pure docs and refactors can skip this. -->
|
|
|
|
### Type of change
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Bug fix
|
|
- [ ] New feature (with prior issue + design alignment)
|
|
- [ ] Refactor / code improvement
|
|
- [ ] Docs
|
|
|
|
### What does this PR do
|
|
|
|
<!-- A short description of the change in your own words. What was wrong, what you changed, why it works. If you can't explain this briefly, the PR is probably too big. -->
|
|
|
|
### How did you verify it
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
This is the section I read most carefully. I need to see that *you* tested this, not that the diff looks plausible.
|
|
|
|
- For UI changes: a screenshot or short video on every affected platform (mobile, web, desktop). UI claims without visual proof are not enough.
|
|
- For behavior changes: the actual steps you ran, and what you observed.
|
|
- For bug fixes: how you reproduced the bug before, and confirmed it's fixed after.
|
|
|
|
AI-generated PR descriptions are fine in principle. AI-generated *verification claims* with no actual testing behind them are not, and they're easy to spot.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
### Checklist
|
|
|
|
- [ ] One focused change. Unrelated cleanups split out.
|
|
- [ ] `npm run typecheck` passes
|
|
- [ ] `npm run lint` passes
|
|
- [ ] `npm run format` ran (Biome)
|
|
- [ ] UI changes include screenshots or video for every affected platform
|
|
- [ ] Tests added or updated where it made sense
|