mirror of
https://github.com/getpaseo/paseo.git
synced 2026-07-29 12:01:31 +00:00
Investigate Codex elicitation fix scope
This commit is contained in:
3
plan.md
3
plan.md
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ Build a new Codex MCP provider side‑by‑side with the existing Codex SDK prov
|
||||
- [x] **Fix**: Codex MCP persistence should include conversationId metadata for resume.
|
||||
- **Done (2025-12-24 19:44)**: Ensured persistence metadata always includes a conversationId, falling back to the session id when needed.
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Investigate**: Elicitation was fixed in Codex 0.71.0 - why isn't it working for us?
|
||||
- [x] **Investigate**: Elicitation was fixed in Codex 0.71.0 - why isn't it working for us?
|
||||
|
||||
- Clone https://github.com/openai/codex to investigate the actual implementation
|
||||
- Web search found: Issue #6992 - Codex auto-declined elicitation requests, fixed in 0.71.0
|
||||
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ Build a new Codex MCP provider side‑by‑side with the existing Codex SDK prov
|
||||
- Check the fix commit for issue #6992
|
||||
- Verify we're actually receiving ElicitRequest but maybe handling it wrong
|
||||
- Add debug logging to confirm what MCP messages we receive
|
||||
- **Done (2025-12-24 19:50)**: Traced the 0.71.0 fix to `codex-rs/rmcp-client/src/logging_client_handler.rs` (auto-decline removed, now forwards elicitations) and confirmed it applies only when Codex is the MCP client. For our `codex mcp-server` flow, elicitations only fire on exec approval requests; with `approval-policy=untrusted` the safe-command allowlist (e.g., `pwd`) bypasses approval, so no `elicitation/create` is emitted.
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Fix**: Codex MCP permission elicitation should surface permission_requested/resolved events (read-only/untrusted too).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user