From 4bd31e1a2e93e86a32777ca70ab7ffff86b76ac6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "paseo-bot[bot]" <266920839+paseo-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 19:47:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] test(cli): accept Codex catalogs without branded model IDs
 (#6633)

The provider regression test rejected valid GPT catalogs solely because no ID contained codex. Keep the structural output checks without requiring that upstream branding substring.

Co-authored-by: paseo-bot[bot] <266920839+paseo-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 packages/cli/tests/15-provider.test.ts | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/packages/cli/tests/15-provider.test.ts b/packages/cli/tests/15-provider.test.ts
index 3081ee3584..3a4f33031c 100644
--- a/packages/cli/tests/15-provider.test.ts
+++ b/packages/cli/tests/15-provider.test.ts
@@ -364,10 +364,6 @@ try {
       ids.every((id) => id.startsWith("gpt-")),
       "all codex model IDs should be from the gpt family",
     );
-    assert(
-      ids.some((id) => id.includes("codex")),
-      "codex model list should include at least one codex-optimized model",
-    );
     assert(
       data.every((m) => m.model && m.id && m.description),
       "every codex model should have model, id, and description fields",